To suggest otherwise would get you laughed out of the room." Arms control "Even if the adults in the room understand this is mainly about satellites, everybody assumes that a Space Force is going to be an armed force. "Some of this comes from officials, including the U.S. Gubrud said that the rollout of the Space Force has been accompanied by all sorts of talk about the armed defense of future asteroid-mining operations, moon bases and sundry fantasies. That is, to having space weapons," said Mark Gubrud, a physicist and adjunct professor in Peace, War and Defense at the University of North Carolina. Creating one implies commitment to having the ability to use force in or from space. "The existence of a Space Force implies the potential use of force in space or from space. Related: The most dangerous space weapons ever Adults in the room "There is no commensurate effort from the State Department to shape the space environment to be more stable and peaceful, which would certainly benefit both military and civil space users." "Using that framework, there is a bureaucratic incentive to hype the threat and then build weapons to counter that threat," she added. But it also organizes military space around deterring and responding to aggression," Grego said. "It still is mostly a bureaucratic reshuffling, without a big budget or increase in personnel.
Grego told that she thinks it may be easy to dismiss the Space Force as a vanity project because of the name. Diplomacy, not bureaucratic reorganization, is urgently needed," said Laura Grego, a senior scientist in the Global Security Program of the Union of Concerned Scientists in Cambridge, Massachusetts. At worst, it would prompt a space arms race that would threaten satellites, not protect them. "At best, a space force is a distraction from what is necessary to ensure security in the face of rapid technological and geopolitical changes. "Or are we talking simply about a renaming of Air Force Space Command where nothing changes except the uniforms and patches, wasting taxpayer dollars?" Hitchens said.
The other question raised by Hitchens concerns whether Congress will allow or force other services to contribute personnel to the Space Force. "Right now, it looks like DoD wants to slow-roll those changes, perhaps in hopes of convincing Congress to cut them some slack," Hitchens said. technological and military advantages in space. (Image credit: United States Space Force)Įstablished in March of last year, the Space Development Agency is tasked, in part, with accelerating the fielding of new military space capabilities necessary to ensure U.S. Traditional camouflage uniform adorned with a blue "U.S. The first is whether and how the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Air Force are going to implement the spirit - and not just the letter - of the congressional mandate in the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act on space acquisition, which created a new position and moved the Space Development Agency to Space Force. Hitchens said there are two big questions at hand regarding the Space Force. Before that, she spent six years in Geneva as director of the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. Theresa Hitchens is the space and air reporter at the online magazine Breaking Defense and a former senior research associate at the University of Maryland's Center for International and Security Studies. Related: Military space: Spacecraft, weapons and tech Uniforms and patches is leading the way on the weaponization of space." "On the negative side, it certainly increases the perception that the U.S. "Whether it will evolve into an organization that solves any of the problems that prompted it remains to be seen," Johnson-Freese told. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Melody Howley) 10, 2020, at Cavalier Air Force Station, North Dakota. Space Force Chief of Space Operations, signs the United States Space Command sign inside the Perimeter Acquisition Radar building on Jan.
0 kommentar(er)
